ecofriendly homestead

Glyphosate (aka Roundup): The Dangers, According to Science

Is glyphosate (Roundup) safe? Find out the recent scientific data in this in-depth review of how glyphosate impacts us and the environment.
Published on
November 27, 2024
Is glyphosate (Roundup) safe? Find out the recent scientific data in this in-depth review of how glyphosate impacts us and the environment.

If you’ve looked around my blog at all, you probably know that I am an environmentalist at heart and try the best that I can to be a steward of the land.

My goal in this article is to be unbiased and scientifically grounded. I will share data and information from various scientific studies.

This article will explore the complexities of glyphosate, so that you can decide for yourself if you’d like to use it on your garden, homestead, or farm.

What is glyphosate?

→ Glyphosate is a herbicide that is often applied to conventional farms and gardens. It became available on the market in 1974, and is one of the most popular herbicides in the US (NPIC).

It is very effective at what it does, and helps farmers and home gardeners alike to control weed pressure.

Glyphosate is the chemical in products in the Roundup line of herbicides. According to Harvard University, some crops have been modified to be “Roundup Ready” so that they are not impacted by the herbicide. These crops are only available to large-scale farmers and cannot be purchased by the home gardener.

The United States EPA deems glyphosate as safe for human health when applied “according to label directions.”

However, there is a lot of debate out there as to just how safe glyphosate is for humans, local ecology, and the greater environment.

Does glyphosate cause cancer?

→ As noted above, the US EPA states that glyphosate is safe for human health when applied according to the label. Its official statement is that glyphosate is “not likely to be carcinogenic to humans.”
However, the World Health Organization (WHO) has maintained since 2015 that it is “probably carcinogenic.

For the ordinary person, this is pretty confusing. How can the EPA and WHO see the issue so differently?

Some folks say that the EPA’s proclamation is more accurate, since they reviewed more documentation than the WHO.

Although, when you dig a little deeper, there is an interesting distinction to note about the kinds of studies each organization reviewed.

According to research published in Environmental Sciences Europe in 2019, the EPA looked at “registrant-commissioned, unpublished regulatory studies,” where 99% of the studies concluded no causes of cancer. It appears that some of the studies evaluated by the EPA were commissioned by Monsanto, the manufacturer of RoundUp.

These studies mostly looked at the average person who was not applying glyphosate in their gardens or farms.

On the other hand, the WHO looked at peer-reviewed studies, where 70% of the studies saw a connection between glyphosate and cancer.

The WHO evaluated a mix of studies from both dietary ingestion and occupational use of the chemical.

Lianne Shappard is a statistician in the field of environmental statistics. She was a member of the US EPA Scientific Advisory Panel that reviewed the EPA’s stance on glyphosate. She says “I was shocked to see that the EPA’s approach to distilling the scientific information obfuscated the evidence.” It also seems like the EPA went against their own guidelines for evaluating studies.

Have other studies focused on human health and glyphosate been done since?

Yes, and here are a few of them:

  1. Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma
    2019: A study published in Mutation Research
    showed a 41% increase of Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma in individuals exposed to glyphosate based herbicide.
  2. Nervous System Impacts
    2022: A review from the International Journal of Molecular Science
    looked at how glyphosate affects the nervous system. They concluded that “Although there are important discrepancies between the analyzed findings, it is unequivocal that exposure to glyphosate produces important alterations in the structure and function of the nervous system of humans, rodents, fish, and invertebrates.” They also noted that while the dose of exposure that caused neurotoxic effects were different, the negative health effects were seen at doses lower than regulated limits.
  3. Oxidative Stress Biomarkers
    2023: A study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute
    found that glyphosate exposure in farmers was directly correlated to an increase in urinary oxidative stress biomarkers. This is significant because these oxidative stress markers are a characteristic of carcinogen exposure.

Additionally:

  1. Childhood exposure to common herbicide may increase the risk of disease in young adulthood
  2. Glyphosate, pathways to modern diseases II: Celiac sprue and gluten intolerance
  3. Glyphosate, pathways to modern diseases III: Manganese, neurological diseases, and associated pathologies

What do studies show about the impacts of glyphosate on the environment?

  1. Wild bee colonies:
    One of the reasons why bee gardening has gained in popularity in recent years is because of decreasing wild bee populations across the globe.

    A study from 2022
    looked at how wild bumblebees were impacted by glyphosate exposure. They found that these bees could not maintain the proper temperature for their colonies. The scientists in this study are concerned because this could prevent reproduction and impact the bee’s already sensitive populations.
  1. Monarch butterflies:
    The decrease in monarch butterfly populations over recent years is staggering. Since 1980, populations have decreased 99.9%. That means for every 1000 butterflies that existed in 1980, only 1 exists now.

    Monarch butterflies are negatively impacted by Round Up because as a broad-spectrum herbicide, it kills off the once prominent milkweed plant
    . Monarch butterflies need native milkweed plants to lay their eggs, as caterpillars can only survive when they eat this plant.
  1. Endangered Animals and Critical Habitats:
    While the EPA states that RoundUp is likely not a concern for humans, they recently performed a Biological Evaluation on glyphosate’s impact on endangered species and habitats.

    The EPA studied 1795 listed endangered species and 792 critical habitats. They found that the “no effect” category regarding glyphosate had NO members. This means that all species and habitats had a “may affect” status or above. Of those, the EPA said that 1676 endangered species and 759 critical habitats were “likely to be adversely affected” by glyphosate. That’s 93% of the studied endangered species and 96% of the critical habitats.
  1. Soil microbes:
    RoundUp and other products with glyphosate have been shown to impact the health of the soil. The soil contains bacteria, fungi, and other microbes that are essential for plant health. These microbes can be negatively impacted after glyphosate application. The same pathway that RoundUp uses to kill plants is also a pathway found in microbes and fungi.

    For example, a 2021 study out of Argentina found soil fungal communities have less biomass and diversity after RoundUp treatments.

    In 2023, a study was conducted on Colorado grassland where RoundUp was applied
    . They found that soil bacteria diversity decreased. They also saw a decrease in soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, which is an extremely important component of plant health and carbon sequestration in soils.

    Unfortunately, the harmful fungi and bacteria often persist in the soils, as this review from 2021 highlights.
  1. Climate Change:
    Two studies came out of the University of Turku, Finland that showed how glyphosate impedes climate change mitigation.

    The first study was published at the end of 2022
    and found that since glyphosate reduces root biomass, there is less carbon sequestration that can occur in the soil.

    The second study, also from the end of 2022, similarly noted the same findings.
    “Decreased root biomass caused by soil glyphosate history goes together with a reduction of carbon allocation belowground.” In turn, this contributes to climate change and extreme weather.

These are some of the reasons why glyphosate products like RoundUp are banned for household use in France, the Netherlands, and Belgium. It is also totally prohibited in Vietnam.

Germany has prohibited its use in public places and hopes to ban it country-wide by the end of 2023. Mexico hopes to follow their lead in 2024.

Alternatives to RoundUp

If you’re ready to ditch the RoundUp for something more environmentally friendly and human-health friendly, here are some options:

Mulching for weed prevention:

mulching with organic materials can prevent weed growth
Mulch your garden to prevent weed growth and to smother existing weeds

I’ve personally found mulching to be very effective as a weed barrier. As a bonus, it breaks down to increase soil organic matter. You can mulch with organic straw, hay, or grass in your raised beds or garden areas, while wood chips work well in pathways or perennial plant zones.

Even when weeds do push through the mulch, their population is less than it would have been without the mulch. I’ve also noticed weeds that are growing through mulch are much easier to pull out fully.

Mulch is one of the core tenants of regenerative gardens for a good reason! In addition to weed prevention and the addition of organic matter, mulch also keeps soil hydrated. This means you'll need to weed less and water less!

Black Plastic in the summer:

black plastic can prevent weed growth in fields
Black plastic tarps can be used without holes in them temporarily, or with holes to plant into. While these are made from plastic, they are reusable if you take care of them.

On our homestead, we have also had success with black plastic tarps covering extreme weedy soil during the heat of the summer. My initial thinking is that this could harm the soil microbiome, but Cornell University says that it may actually increase soil microbial activity.

University of California shares that solarization (with clear plastic in summer instead of black plastic) can increase levels of beneficial microorganisms as well. Solarization is another technique to control weeds, pests, and soil-borne diseases. They state, “many beneficial soil organisms are able to either survive solarization or recolonize the soil very quickly afterwards.”

Many organic regenerative farmers terminate their cover crop plantings with black plastic tarps as an alternative to roller crimping.

Vigilance:

pull weeds instead of glyphosphate
A garden hoe is a great tool to have as you walk through your garden to cut back any small weed seedlings on sight

While it’s more time-intensive and takes more physical labor, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure when it comes to weeds.

Checking out your garden, lawn, and landscape regularly and pulling up any troubling weeds can help prevent weed problems down the line. If a plant is removed and comes back multiple times, you can still prevent it from going to seed by continuously cutting it back until winter temperatures help you out.

When we first moved to our homestead, I delighted in the large and vibrant Bull Thistle plants that were scattered around the property. I was happy to see their fluffy whisps of seeds floating in the wind in the late summer. That winter, however, I learned that Bull Thistles are a non-native plant in my area, and are highly invasive.

Not surprisingly, I had a large number of Bull Thistle seedlings come up the following year. The population might have increased 10 or 20 fold. However, I was persistent about picking the seedlings out. I didn’t get the root all of the time. However, I knew that each time I cut the plant back, I was one step closer to preventing that plant from setting seed. I became really good at spotting small Bull Thistle plants from afar.

The following year, there were still a few Bull Thistles that came back, but the population was much smaller and far more manageable.

This year I only had a few Bull Thistle seedlings emerge.

This exemplifies the same principles of integrated pest management, but in this case, the pests are the weeds.

RoundUp and Glyphosate: You probably don’t need them, so why risk it?

In conclusion, you may wish to avoid the use of glyphosate and Roundup. If not for your own health, then for the health of the environment.

It’s true that the US EPA considers glyphosate safe when used according to label directions. However, the classification of glyphosate as "probably carcinogenic" by the World Health Organization raises concerns.

Recent studies have linked glyphosate to cancer and neurological impacts, pollinator populations, soil health degradation, and even global warming.

It seems safer to implement alternative methods for weed control, such as organic mulching, plastic tarps, and manual removal of weeds. These alternatives help mitigate the potential risks associated with glyphosate and can be effective weed management practices.

Learn more about organic regenerative gardening:

Find out the basics of regenerative practices, and learn what steps to take to make your garden regenerative.